Everything about Erastianism totally explained
Thomas Erastus (
September 7,
1524 –
December 31,
1583) was a
Swiss theologian best known for a posthumously published work in which he argued that the sins of Christians should be punished by the state, and not by the church withholding the sacraments. A generalization of this idea, that the state is supreme in church matters, is known somewhat misleadingly as Erastianism.
Life
Erastus, whose surname was Liber, Lieber, or Liebler, was born of poor parents, probably at
Baden,
Canton of Aargau, Switzerland.
In 1540 he was studying theology at
Basel. The
plague of 1544 drove him to
Bologna and thence to
Padua as student of
philosophy and medicine. In 1553 he became
physician to the count of Henneberg,
Saxe-Meiningen, and in 1558 held the same post with the elector-palatine,
Otto Heinrich, being at the same time professor of medicine at
Heidelberg. His patron's successor,
Frederick III, made him (1559) a
privy councillor and member of the church
consistory.
In theology he followed
Zwingli, and at the
sacramentarian conferences of Heidelberg (1560) and
Maulbronn (1564) he advocated by voice and pen the
Zwinglian doctrine of the
Lord's Supper, replying (1565) to the counter arguments of the
Lutheran Johann Marbach, of
Strasbourg. He ineffectually resisted the efforts of the
Calvinists, led by
Caspar Olevianus, to introduce the
Presbyterian polity and discipline, which were established at Heidelberg in 1570, on the Genevan model.
One of the first acts of the new church system was to excommunicate Erastus on a charge of
Socinianism, founded on his correspondence with
Transylvania. The ban wasn't removed till 1575, Erastus declaring his firm adhesion to the doctrine of the
Trinity. His position, however, was uncomfortable, and in 1580 he returned to
Basel, where in 1583 he was made professor of ethics.
Works
He published several pieces bearing on medicine,
astrology and
alchemy, and attacking the system of
Paracelsus. His name is permanently associated with a posthumous publication, written in 1568. Its immediate occasion was the disputation at Heidelberg (1568) for the doctorate of theology by
George Wither, an English
Puritan (subsequently Archdeacon of
Colchester), silenced (1565) at
Bury St Edmunds by
Archbishop Parker.
Withers had proposed a disputation against vestments, which the university wouldn't allow; his thesis affirming the
excommunicating power of the presbytery was sustained. Hence the
Treatise of Erastus. It was published (1589) by
Giacomo Castelvetro, who had married his widow, with the title
Explicatio gravissimae quaestionis utrum excommunicatio, quatenus religionem intelligentes et amplexantes, a sacramentorum usu, pro pier admissum facinus arcet, mandato natur divino, an excogitala sit ab hominibus. The work bears the imprint Pesclavii (for example Poschiavo in the
Grisons) but was printed by John Wolfe in London, where Castelvetri was staying; the name of the alleged printer is an anagram of "Jacobum Castelvetrum." In the
Stationers' Register (
June 20,
1589) the printing is said to have been allowed by
Archbishop Whitgift.
It consists of seventy-five
Theses, followed by a
Confirmatio in six books, and an appendix of letters to Erastus by
Heinrich Bullinger and
Rudolph Gualther, showing that his
Theses, written in 1568, had been circulated in manuscript. An English translation of the
Theses, with brief life of Erastus (based on
Melchior Adam's account), was issued in 1659, entitled
The Nullity of Church Censures; it was reprinted as
A Treatise of Excommunication (1682), and, as revised by Robert Lee, D.D., in 1844.
The aim of the work is to show, on Scriptural grounds, that sins of professing Christians are to be punished by civil authority, and not by withholding of sacraments on the part of the clergy. In the
Westminster Assembly a party holding this view included
John Selden,
John Lightfoot, Coleman and
Bulstrode Whitelocke, whose speech (1645) is appended to Lee's version of the
Theses; but the opposite view, after much controversy, was carried, Lightfoot alone dissenting. The consequent chapter of the
Westminster Confession of Faith ("Of Church Censures") was, however, not ratified by the English parliament. Erastianism, as a by-word, is used to denote the doctrine of the supremacy of the state in ecclesiastical causes; but the problem of the relations between church and state is one on which Erastus nowhere enters.
What is known as Erastianism would be better connected with the name of
Hugo Grotius. The only direct reply made to the
Explicatio was the
Tractatus de vera excommunicatione (1590) by
Theodore Beza, who found himself rather savagely attacked in the
Confirmatio thesium; for example "Apostolum et Mosen adeoque Deum ipsum audes corrigere."
Further Information
Get more info on 'Erastianism'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://thomas_erastus.totallyexplained.com">Thomas Erastus Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |